tradition. In scientific prefaces, received ‘tradition’ is one of the components of the ‘author’s qualifications’ (esp. pp. 82–85). But such authorial claims imply that the main content of their books will be an account of the received tradition (e.g., p. 82). In the gospel preface (Lk. 1:2), the author claims to be the recipient of tradition (pp. 116–117). And the content of both Luke and Acts may be regarded as an account of traditional material (pp. 203–06). This analysis appears to provide a
Page 26